Johnston

Clark v. Johnston

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 285·49 Cal. App. 315·193 P. 864
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 1920Civ. No. 3211.California2,251 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Beasly, J.

These are appeals by the defendants in the several cases from identical orders vacating in each case a satisfaction of judgment theretofore entered in favor of the respective plaintiffs in the actions entitled as above. The orders were made upon the motion of the respondent Rauer, a stranger to the record. There are three eases, similar in all respects, consolidated by stipulation and tried together in the superior court, and they are here upon a consolidated record under section 941a et seq. of the- Code of Civil Procedure.

Avoiding so far as possible unnecessary detail, the facts of the three cases may be stated as. follows: Clark, the plaintiff, was a bookkeeper in the office of Rauer, a collector. Rauer held three promissory notes as indorsee or assignee against Davis and his codefendants. Rauer transferred these notes to Clark by assignments absolute in form. The purpose of the assignments was solely that Clark’s name should be used as plaintiff in these actions, which were accordingly begun in his name, one against Johnston and Davis, another against Campin and Davis, and the third against Taylor and Davis. A fourth action not embodied in this record figured in the facts as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.