Heringer

Heringer v. Schumacher

Good Law
88 Cal. App. 349·263 P. 550
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1928Docket No. 3150.California1,643 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

This canse is before us upon an appeal by the plaintiffs from an order transferring the place of trial from the county of Sacramento to the city and county of San Francisco. The complaint alleges that the defendants agreed to purchase a certain quantity of beans from the plaintiffs. The title of the action purports to sue the defendants not only as individuals but as doing business under the firm name of Richard J. Murphy. The complaint, however, contains no allegation of the defendants conducting business under that name. The affidavits upon which the place of trial was ordered transferred from the county of Sacramento to the city and county of San Francisco show that the defendant Schumacher was at all times a resident of the county of Sacramento, and that the defendant was at all times a resident of the city and county of San Francisco. The complaint simply alleges that the agreed to purchase a certain quantity of beans. The affidavits submitted to the trial court upon the motion of the defendants set forth the contract relative to the of the beans in question, which contract .is in the words and figures following, to wit:

In consideration of the price herein specified, it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.