Ritchie

Slama Tire Protector Co. v. Ritchie

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 410·31 Cal. App. 555·161 P. 25
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1916Civ. No. 1574.California3,425 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hart, J.

This appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment and the order denying it a new trial.

The controversy arises out of a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants, as copartners, at Kansas City, Missouri, on the eighth day of October, 1910. Said contract is made a part of the complaint.

The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Nebraska.'

The defendants, at the time of the making of the contract mentioned, were copartners, doing business in the city of Sacramento, under the firm name of Ritchie & Heriot.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether the contract upon which the action is founded was one whereby the plaintiff agreed to sell and the defendants agreed to purchase certain tire protectors at the prices and upon the conditions therein specified, or was one whereby the plaintiff agreed to ship or make consignments of the tire protectors to the de- , fendants upon the understanding or condition that the protectors to be so shipped or consigned should be paid for only when they were sold by the defendants; or, to put the proposition in another form, it is, whether the parties to the con tract intended it to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.