Northern Light Mining Co. v. Blue Goose Mining Co.

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 357·25 Cal. App. 282·143 P. 540
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 1914Civ. No. 1225.California4,427 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The complaint was in two counts to recover damages for different breaches of a written contract providing for the lease of certain gold mining claims in which plaintiff was the lessor and defendant the lessee. The first count was based upon defendant’s failure to pay plaintiff the sum of $2,611.68, the amount due as rent and royalty under the terms of said lease, and the second count sought damages for defendant’s refusal to continue dredging on the demised premises for the balance of the term.

Respondent moved for judgment on the pleadings as to the first count and the motion was granted and from said order the defendant has appealed. There was a trial as to the second count and plaintiff obtained a judgment thereon for $8,375, from which also defendant has appealed.

As to the judgment on the pleadings error is claimed for the following reasons: 1. That the first count of the complaint does not state a cause of action; and, 2. That the answer thereto states three complete defenses, to wit: there was no money due, there was an executed oral agreement modifying the lease, and a custom existed permitting the abandonment of leased mining ground.

The said first count, after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.