Randall

California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 390·76 Cal. App. 321·244 P. 958
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 1926Docket No. 2956.California1,663 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

The plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promissory note, payable six months after date, given by the defendant to the Virden Packing Company, a corporation, and by that company assigned, after maturity, to the plaintiff for collection. The defendant entered into an agreement with the packing company to purchase ten shares of its capital stock at $100 a share, the par value thereof. He paid $250 on the purchase price and gave the note in suit for the remainder thereof. The agreement contained the following provisions: “It is expressly agreed that no stock is to be issued until the amount of this subscription and note or notes given therefor are paid in full in cash. . . . The subscription contract . . . contains the entire contract between the subscriber and the company and no agent or representative of the company, or any other person, has any power to change or alter the terms of this subscription. . . . Verbal or other agreements between .agents and applicants contrary to the terms of this contract are not authorized and will not be recognized by the company.” The answer sets up as an affirmative defense that the de fendant was induced to enter into the contract and to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.