Downey
Downey v. Cavasso
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Lennon, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant after an order sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to further amend.
The demurrer was grounded upon the sufficiency of the facts stated to constitute a cause of action and the uncertainty and unintelligibility of the averments of the complaint.
The plaintiff’s complaint, when disentangled, discloses .that the gist of the plaintiff’s grievance arises out of a set of facts which, concretely stated and in the order in which they are rightly related, are these: On and for some time prior to the second day of January, 1913, the plaintiff and defendant were copartners, doing business in the city of Oakland under the firm name of the “Downey-Cavasso Glass & Paint Co.” On that date, the plaintiff and defendant caused to be created, out of the assets of, and for the purpose of enhancing the conduct of, the business of the copartnership, a corporation under the former firm name. All of the issued corporate capital stock, save one share reserved for the purpose of qualifying the necessary third member of the corporation, was owned and held in equal shares by the plaintiff and…