Warden

Warden v. Choate

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 302·33 Cal. App. 354·165 P. 36·165 P.2d 36
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 1917Civ. No. 1927.California862 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment denying them any relief in this action, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The defendant here, in March, 1914, brought an action against these plaintiffs and certain officials of the city of Los Angeles in which injunctive relief was asked for. A temporary restraining order was made pending the hearing of an order to show cause which was set for the sixth day of April, 1914. These plaintiffs appeared in response to the order to show cause and demurred to the complaint of the plaintiff (this defendant), and made a further showing by affidavit in opposition to the application for injunction pendente lite. At the time fixed as the return day on the order to show cause, the demurrer was considered by the court and sustained, and the action there ended. This action was prosecuted for the purpose of obtaining damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the restraint imposed under the temporary restraining order. The action, however, is upon the alleged undertaking of the defendant here, who was plaintiff in the injunction suit, by which in that suit he gave security against damages on account of the restraining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.