Westberg

Westberg v. Whittiken

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 204·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 250·281 P. 509
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 1929Docket No. 3891.California1,471 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiff had judgment against R. E. Whittiken and Mayme B. Whittiken, his wife, for the sum of $985.75, and also for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on certain property described in the complaint. From this judgment said defendants appeal.

The action was originally begun for the collection of $1750 and the enforcement of a lien to secute the payment thereof, on account of work and labor performed by the plaintiff in furnishing plastering material and plastering a certain residence constructed by R. E. Whittiken and Mayme B. Whittiken, his wife. After the beginning of the action the sum of $729.25 was paid on said account. The record shows that the defendants Whittiken constructed a certain residence by day labor; that no contract for the erection of the building was ever entered into by the defendants with anyone. The record further shows that at about the time of the beginning of the erection of the building referred to,- the defendants Whittiken employed A. B. Maescher and V. E. Maeseher, doing business as DeLuxe Building Company, as their agents, to take charge of the construction, and manage the construction of the building referred to. The complaint alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.