Rinner

People Ex Rel. Williamson v. Rinner

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 189·52 Cal. App. 747·199 P. 1066
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 1921Civ. No. 2256.California3,890 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The action was in quo warranto to have it adjudged that defendants were usurping and improperly exercising the office of trustees of Courthouse School District in the county of Sonoma. This district was created by a special act of the legislature in 1878 (Stats. 1877-78, p. 752) and embraced what now constitutes the city of Santa Rosa and some adjacent territory outside the corporate limits thereof. In 1919 (Stats. 1919, p. 239) the legislature repealed the said act of 1878 creating said district. At the time of said repeal, and for some time prior thereto, the defendants were the duly acting and qualified trustees of the said Courthouse School District and they claim that their right to said office has not been affected for the reason that said attempted repeal of said act of 1878 was and is invalid. As to this vital consideration the court’s finding is: “That it is true that the act of the legislature of 1919 of the state of California approved May 5, 1919, which repealed the said act of the legislature of the state of California of 1878 approved March 30, 1878, is now and at the time of the filing of the complaint in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.