Nakanishi

Nakanishi v. Policy Holders Life Insurance

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 747·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1086·19 P.2d 287
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1933Docket No. 8609.California1,294 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Parker, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a change of venue from Contra Costa County to Los Angeles County. The action was to recover upon life insurance policies.

The complaint set up the contracts of insurance in Tiaec verba, alleged the death of the insured in the county of Contra Costa, and that plaintiff was the beneficiary under the policies. Upon its first appearance defendant demanded a change of the place of trial, and filed its written demand and affidavit of residence as well as the required affidavit of merits. No point is made by respondent as to the procedure. The affidavit upon which the demand for change of venue is based may be summarized. It is set forth that the contracts of insurance upon which the action is based were issued upon the signed applications of one Yuldchi Arii; that the applications were received by defendant in the city of Los Angeles; that the policies were issued from Los Angeles ; that the policies were issued and the contracts consummated in Los Angeles by delivery of the contracts at Los Angeles, and that said contracts were to be performed, and the liability thereon arose, at Los Angeles, where defendant has its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.