State of Arizona v. Environmental Protection Agency, Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Proper Environmental Planning, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Homart Development Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

521 F.2d 825 8 ERC 1238 STATE OF ARIZONA et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. BROADWAY-HALE STORES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. HOMART DEVELOPMENT CO., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. Nos. 73-3577, 73-3588, 74-1001, 74-1002, 74-1009 and 74-1013. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 8, 1975. Patrick Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Ariz. (argued), Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner in No. 73-3577. Henry C. Thumann (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner in No. 73-3588. Richard K. Mallery, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner in No. 74-1001. Vincent W. Jones, Alhambra, Cal., for petitioner in No. 74-1002. Henry C. Thumann, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner in No. 74-1009. Alex D. Fred, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner in No. 74-1013. Michael Graves, Atty. (argued), App. Section, Land & Nat. Resources Div.,…