Kelly

Kelly v. Universal Oil Supply Co.

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 588·65 Cal. App. 493·224 P. 261
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 1924Civ. No. 2677.California1,442 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for the cancellation of an agreement, a lease and a promissory note and mortgage. The defendant Glendale National Bank filed a cross-complaint to recover the amount of the promissory note and to foreclose the mortgage. The action was dismissed as against defendant Hoggins. The bank held the note and mortgage as security for a loan made by it to de fendant Hamil in the sum of $3,500. The court gave the bank judgment against plaintiffs for the sum of $3,500 and unpaid interest and counsel fees in the sum of $350 and entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs against the other defendants for the cancellation of all the aforesaid instruments. The plaintiffs and the bank have appealed on a single record. The question raised by the appeals is whether the facts found by the court support the judgment. The findings of the court are substantially as follows:

October 28, 1920, plaintiffs agreed to lease certain lands to Hoggins for a term of twenty years “for the purpose of mining and prospecting for oil and gas.” The agreement provided that Hoggins should begin drilling operations within four months after the execution of the lease 'and “pay a royalty of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.