O'Donnell

City of Long Beach v. O'Donnell

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 1036·91 Cal. App. 760·267 P. 585
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 1928Docket No. 5692.California965 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

This was a proceeding in eminent domain brought to condemn several parcels of real property for public park purposes. The appellants were named in the complaint as defendants and filed an answer, appearing by attorneys whom they had engaged for that purpose. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed notice of abandonment of the proceedings; whereupon appellants sought and obtained, under section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure, a judgment of dismissal. Appellants then filed a cost bill in which they included a sum claimed by them as attorney fees. Plaintiff made a motion to tax costs and upon the hearing of this motion the court made an order striking out entirely the item of attorney fees. From this order the appeal is taken.

The order is defended by plaintiff upon the ground that appellants had employed their attorneys on a contingent fee basis, whereby the attorneys were to receive nothing unless the plaintiff took the property, and that hence appellants had not incurred any liability for attorney fees, and section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure did not authorize the award of such fees to them on the abandonment of the proceedings. That section reads in part as follows: “Upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.