Schmidt

Schmidt v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 5·10 P.2d 107
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 1932Docket No. 4520.California1,969 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Preston, J.

This is an action for damages brought by plaintiff, a minor of the age of nine years, through his guardian ad litem, against the defendant municipality, under subdivision 2 of the Statutes of 1923, page 675, for certain personal injuries received by plaintiff as the result of a fall from an alleged dangerous and defective slide maintained in the public playgrounds of the defendant, City of Vallejo.

The case having been called for trial, a jury was impaneled and evidence adduced. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case defendant moved for a nonsuit, which motion was granted and judgment of nonsuit entered.

Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from said judgment.

The statute mentioned is found in the Statutes of 1923, page 675, and subdivision 2 thereof reads as follows:

Specific attention may be called to the opening portion of the law, as follows:

Cases arising under the statute quoted have been before the courts many times and it is needless to review the authorities. A mere citation to such authorities will suffice: Hook v. City of Sacramento, 118 Cal. App. 547 [ 5 Pac. (2d) 643 ]; Huff v. Compton Grammar School, 92 Cal. App. 44 [ 267 Pac. 918 ]; Dawson v. Tulare High School, 98…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.