Stimson Mill Co. v. Hughes Manufacturing Co.

Good Law
8 Cal. App. 559·97 P. 322
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 1908Civ. No. 504.California1,170 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a new trial.

The action is to recover for building material alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant at an agreed price. It is alleged in the complaint that the material was delivered in lots on various dates between November 5, 1904, and January, 1905. That upon the delivery of each lot an itemized account was furnished defendant showing the amount and price, and that the same was sold by plaintiff to defendant. That at various dates after the final delivery an account was rendered by plaintiff to defendant, showing the transaction in detail, which defendant retained and never made objection thereto until May, 1905; and it is alleged that by reason thereof said account became stated and defendant had agreed and assented thereto and is accordingly indebted. Nonpayment is alleged. The second count in the complaint is for goods sold and delivered. An issue was raised by the answer as to each and all of the allegations of the complaint. The court found in favor of defendant upon all the issues.

It appears from the record that prior to September, 1903, Hughes Brothers were engaged in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.