Wing Chung Long Co. v. Prussian National Insurance

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 231·33 Cal. App. 715·166 P. 358·166 P.2d 358
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 1917Civ. No. 1816.California910 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

The judgment in this case was for the plaintiff; the appeal from the judgment is presented on a judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

The action was to recover upon a fire insurance policy. Plaintiff, in December, 1912, secured through one Youtz, a broker, insurance from the defendant corporation as evi deuced by its policy of that date. This policy was in form that known as “California Standard,” as prescribed in an act of the legislature of 1909. (Stats. 1909, p. 404.) The policy, corresponding to the terms of the statute, contained this clause as to conditions under which cancellation thereof might he made by either party :

On March 25, 1913, the defendant company transmitted to the insured the following letter:

The plaintiff alleged that in January, 1913, the defendant attempted to cancel the policy by serving a notice that the policy would be canceled for nonpayment of premium unless within five days the plaintiff paid such premium, and that as the plaintiff had made payment of the premium, it was led to believe “that if said premium was in fact paid said policy would not be canceled, and this plaintiff knowing that said premium had been paid did not deliver said policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.