Baird

Baird v. Olsheski

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 109·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 332·2 P.2d 493
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 1931Docket No. 7846.California689 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Spence, J.

In this action for conversion of certain capital stock, judgment was entered in favor of defendant, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.

On the trial no evidence was offered by defendant. There is no dispute regarding the facts hereinafter set forth, which facts were proved either by the uncontradicted testimony introduced by plaintiff or by stipulation. Plaintiff borrowed the sum of $500 from defendant and as security for a promissory note in that amount delivered to defendant a certificate duly indorsed for 100 shares of the capital stock of Baird-Bailhache Company. The note bore the notation “100 shares Baird-Bailhache Co. stock attached”. The stock was of the approximate value of $1,000. At the time of the transaction it was orally agreed by the parties that defendant would not sell the stock or take any action to recover the debt without notifying plaintiff. The note matured and defendant, without notice to plaintiff, commenced an action on the note and recovered judgment by default. No mention of the pledged property was made in this action. Thereafter, and without notice to and without the knowledge of plaintiff, defendant caused execution to be levied and said stock was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.