Raisch

Raisch v. Warren

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 71·39 Cal. App. 219·178 P. 529
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1918Civ. No. 2564.California1,075 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, against the administrator of the estate of Charles A. Warren, deceased, and his heirs, for the purpose of securing an accounting arising out of an alleged partnership, and a judgment in plaintiff’s favor for such amount as might be found due.

Upon the trial of the case, and when objection was made to plaintiff and another witness, Buckman, being allowed to testify in support of their claim, plaintiff’s counsel having concluded that it was not within the power of the court to render a money judgment, waived that petition in the prayer, and the action proceeded merely for an accounting.

It was stipulated that if deceased was found to be a partner, the liability for contribution resting on his estate aggregated the sum of $182,792.14.

Judgment was for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

It is the claim of plaintiff that Charles A. Warren, A. E. Buckman, and plaintiff entered into and formed a partnership for the purpose of bidding upon and securing certain contracts, among which was one from the United States government relating to what is known as the Truekee-Carson project of Nevada, a scheme for the diversion and conveyance of water from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.