Dorn

Montgomery v. Dorn

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 201·25 Cal. App. 666·145 P. 148
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 1914Civ. No. 1295.California2,956 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

In plaintiff’s amended complaint it is alleged that defendant Fitch executed his promissory note to plaintiff, September 26, 1908, for the sum of one thousand three hundred and sixty dollars, payable ninety days after date, with interest after maturity, secured by certain shares of Home Circle Cash Store & Mail Order House, a corporation; that, after the execution of said promissory note and prior to the commencement of the action, defendants Dorn and Rankin ‘ ‘ expressly and in writing undertook, agreed and promised the said Chas. A. Fitch, for a good and valuable consideration moving to them, and to each of them, to pay the said promissory note and the whole thereof for the express benefit of plaintiff herein and said undertaking, agreement and promise has at no time been rescinded. ’ ’

The prayer is for judgment against defendants for one thousand three hundred and sixty dollars, with interest at seven per cent after December 26, 1908, and that said pledged property be sold and the proceeds applied to the payment of said indebtedness and for general relief.

Defendant Rankin interposed a general and special demurrer to the amended complaint which, being overruled, he answered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.