Ohanesian

Ohanesian v. Galente

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 188·59 Cal. App. 585·211 P. 238
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1922Civ. No. 3767.California1,490 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Action to recover money due on a promissory note. Cross-action to recover damages suffered through wrongful acts of the plaintiff, connected with the same transaction in which the note was made. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Respondents were the owners of a tract of land, subject to a two thousand dollar mortgage held by the Producers’ Savings Bank. Respondents employed appellant to sell this land for them to one Kalfas, for the sum of five thousand five hundred dollars, of which two thousand dollars was to be used to pay the existing mortgage debt, and the remainder to be payable in several installments secured by mortgage on the land conveyed by defendants to Kalfas. The deed to Kalfas, and the three thousand five hundred dollar mortgage by Kalfas to respondents, were placed in escrow. At or about the same time Kalfas arranged to borrow two thousand dollars from the Visalia Savings Bank and Trust Company, to be secured by first mortgage on the same property. This mortgage also was placed in escrow. The several documents were recorded in the following order: first, the deed to Kalfas; next, the two thousand dollar mortgage to the Savings Bank, and then the mortgage to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.