Ballo

People v. Ballo

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 370·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 22·125 P. 1081
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1912Crim. No. 181.California1,009 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial he prosecutes this appeal.

The assault upon the judgment and order is founded principally upon alleged errors of the trial court in the statement of the law to the jury.

The facts are briefly these: The complaining witness, one G. Saloni, an Italian laborer, went to the city of Stockton with an acquaintance of his in the month of December, 1911. They registered at the Roma Hotel, which was conducted by one of their countrymen. Saloni had for some time prior to his arrival at Stockton worked as a laborer for the Feather River Lumber Company, near Portola, in Plumas county, and when he reached Stockton had approximately $200, a portion of which he carried in two checks—one for $57 and another for $54.80. These checks he deposited, for safekeeping, with the proprietor of the Roma Hotel. It appears that, shortly after his arrival at Stockton, he began drinking rather heavily, and remained more or less in a state of intoxication for several days. While thus conducting himself, he made the acquaintance of the defendant, with whom thereafter he had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.