McCallum

McCallum v. Stull

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 190·59 Cal. App. 572·211 P. 466
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1922Civ. No. 4197.California701 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to foreclose a judgment lien. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendant G. L. Stull has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The record presents but one question, and that is the question of procedure. Before proceeding further it is necessary to state the facts concerning the history of this litigation.

Prior to the ninth day of July, 1915, G. L. Stull, the appellant, commenced an action against P. McCallum et al., to quiet title. Thereafter the defendant in that action appeared and answered and at the same time filed a cross-complaint. Later the plaintiff answered the cross-complaint. Thereafter the cause as made by the pleadings came on for trial, and on May 11 such proceedings were had that the cause was ordered dismissed. An entry was made by the courtroom clerk in his minutes, and an entry was made in the register of actions, “1916 May 11. Cause dismissed.” Thereafter no proceedings were had until February 19, 1919. On that date findings of fact and conclusions of law were duly signed and filed and on the same date a judgment in due form was also signed and filed and the judgment-roll…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.