McCormick-Ormand Co. v. Nofziger Brothers Lumber Co.

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 241·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 254·101 P. 688
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1909Civ. No. 565.California756 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Action in form for money had and received. Judgment passed for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying its motion for a new trial, defendant prosecutes this appeal.

It is alleged in the complaint that on or about July 1, 1904, the defendant received the sum of $400 from the Lynn-Lewis Company, a corporation, to and for the use of plaintiff. This allegation is put in issue by specific denial contained in the answer.

Appellant, among other assignments of error, contends that the court not only failed to find upon this issue, but also insists that certain of the findings, without which the judgment has no support, are outside the issues. We are inclined to recognize both contentions as being correct.

The finding of the court necessary to a consideration of the question is, in effect, that Lynn-Lewis Company, plaintiff’s assignor, and the defendant entered into a tripartite agreement whereby the former should sell and transfer to the defendant certain notes and mortgages then owned by the Lynn-Lewis Company; that as a part of the consideration for such transfer and assignment, defendant promised and agreed with the Lynn-Lewis Company and plaintiff’s assignor that it would pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.