Mazuran

Mazuran v. Finn

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 467·53 Cal. App. 656·200 P. 769
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 1921Civ. No. 3900.California1,609 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate directing respondent, as sheriff, to sell certain personal property levied upon by him under execution. The petitioner, as plaintiff in an action against Frank F. Akaeich and George Dimmich, was awarded judgment in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco in the sum of $5,000, with interest and costs, no part of which having been paid, the respondent, under instructions, levied a writ of execution upon a linotype machine, and its accessories, alleged to belong to the judgment debtor, Akaeich. John H. Leighton and E. E. Carreras served on the sheriff a written claim, verified by oath, setting out their right to the possession of the property. The petitioner thereupon indemnified respondent against the third party claim by an undertaking, executed as provided in section 689 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The sheriff accepted and approved the bond and proceeded to advertise the property for sale.

Before any sale could be had Leighton and Carreras, assuming to act under the provisions of sections 710 to 713½, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure, executed to the sheriff a bond in double the value of the property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.