Houts

Houts v. First Trust & Savings Bank

Good Law
34 Cal. App. 613·168 P. 383
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 1917Civ. No. 2148.California816 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an action in which the plaintiff sought to restrain the. defendants from enforcing a writ of assistance for the eviction of herself from the possession of the premises involved in the action.

The facts of the case were these: Prior to January 7, 1907, the plaintiff and her husband, W. A. Houts, were the owners of the premises in question and occupied the same as their family residence. On the above date they joined in- a deed to the property to one Edward O’Gara upon the understanding between themselves and their grantee that he would at once execute a lease thereof to the plaintiff for the term of forty years at the nominal rental of one dollar per annum; and, apparently, upon the further understanding that he would presently convey the property to a corporation known as the Traders’ Investment Company; The said O’Gara immediately executed said lease, delivering the same to the plaintiff, who in turn gave it to her husband, who put it away in his safe deposit box. This lease was never recorded. A few days later O’Gara conveyed the property to the Traders’ Investment Company. There was no consideration moving to O’Gara for any of these transactions, and the Traders’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.