Bitsekas

Bitsekas v. Parechanian

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 286·67 Cal. App. 148·226 P. 974
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1924Civ. No. 2733.California1,428 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of the defendant Parechanian, brought this action to set aside a deed executed by the latter to the defendant Sarkisian, conveying a half interest in a tract of forty acres of land situated in Kings County, on the ground that said deed of conveyance was the result of a fraudulent conspiracy between the two defendants to prevent the plaintiff from securing satisfaction of a judgment previously obtained by plaintiff and against Parechanian in the superior court of Fresno County for the sum of $2,153.90.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff brought an action against Parechanian in the above-mentioned superior court, and on June 19, 1921, was awarded judgment for the amount above stated; that execution upon said judgment was issued on the thirteenth day of September, 1921, and the writ thereupon placed in the hands of the sheriff of the county of Fresno for execution, and said writ returned unsatisfied; that thereafter, and on the thirteenth day of October, 1921, “a similar writ of execution was placed in the hands of the Sheriff of the County of Kings. . . . for execution, and that said writ has likewise been returned unsatisfied.” The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.