Anderson

Anderson v. Palladine

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 62·39 Cal. App. 256·178 P. 553
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1918Civ. No. 2618.California3,347 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

In this action plaintiff sought and secured a judgment quieting his title to two quarter-sections of timber land situated in the county of Fresno. The record before us shows only the answer and appeal of the defendant ITumeBennett Lumber Company, Incorporated.

The corporation appellant made no claim to the land in suit as distinguished from the timber growing thereon, but its answer, in addition to denying all of the material allegations of the complaint, pleaded several special defenses, only one of which, however, is involved upon this appeal, namely: That defense which interposed the corporation defendant’s claim of an existing right and title to the timber in question based upon the fact of the execution of a grant deed by and from plaintiff conveying the timber standing and growing upon one of the quarter-sections of the land involved in the suit to certain grantees, who in turn conveyed their title to the timber to the Kings River Lumber Company, which title was, by mesne conveyances, ultimately transferred to the corporation defendant. The deed from plaintiff upon which this defense rested was executed some twenty-eight years prior to the institution of the action, and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.