Fisher

Fisher v. Pennington

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 248·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 307·2 P.2d 518
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 1931Docket No. 7600.California1,225 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ward, J.

Defendants and appellants Pennington owned and operated an apartment house in San Francisco. Plaintiff and respondent Aileen Fisher paid one month’s rent in advance for a furnished apartment. On the morning of the thirteenth day of March, 1929, plaintiff was occupying a bed in the furnished apartment when the door to which the bed was attached fell inward over the top of the bed, causing injuries to plaintiff. A jury returned a verdict against the defendants.

The door was used as a partition between a room and a closet and was attached to the floor and the overhead wall. Its removal would have marred the appearance of the apartment to its detriment, and therefore may be considered part of the realty. The bed was connected to the door by small plates fastened by a few screws that could easily be removed. Section 660 of the Civil Code provides as follows: “A thing is deemed to be affixed to land when it is attached to it by roots, as in the case of trees, vines or shrubs; or imbedded in it as in the case of walls; or permanently resting upon it, as in the ease of buildings; or permanently attached to what is thus permanent, as by means of cement, plaster, nails, bolts or screws.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.