Taber

Jack E. Cloyd Co. v. Taber

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 384·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 202·282 P. 979
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 1929Docket No. 5675.California1,056 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

York, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. In the month of May, 1924, a representative of plaintiff company observed a ‘1 Will-build-to-suit-tenant ’ ’ sign upon a lot at Temple Street and Burton Way in the city of Los Angeles, owned by defendant Emma E. Taber, which sign directed all inquiries regarding said lot be addressed to Lewelleyn J. Smith. On May 28th, as a culmination of discussion between plaintiff company and defendant Smith, an agreement was executed by them authorizing plaintiff to negotiate a lease for ten years upon a proposed theater building to be erected by Smith upon said lot, on a rental basis satisfactory to said Smith and the lessee. This agreement provided: “And for and in consideration of services which the Jack E. Cloyd Company may render in the negotiation of said lease or upon our closing the aforesaid lease with party or parties with whom the Jack E. Cloyd Company have had negotiations, we agree to pay the regular Realty Board commission at the time the plans and specifications are approved and accepted by the Lessee. ’ ’

Thereafter, on June 4, 1924, an agreement to build and lease was executed by said Smith, as builder, and Messrs.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.