Egilbert

Egilbert v. Superior Court

Good Law
6 Cal. App. 190·91 P. 748
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 1907Civ. No. 384.California1,537 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

The petition shows: That on April 10, 1907, a petition for a writ of mandate was filed in defendant court, and thereafter, to wit, on May 22, 1907, a peremptory writ was issued put of said court, directed to affiant, as secretary of the Pacific Power Company, commanding affiant “as such Secretary immediately after the receipt of said writ to permit one T. W. H. Shanahan, at whose instance and in whose behalf said peremptory writ of mandate was granted, to inspect all of the books ... of the Pacific Power Company”; that said peremptory'writ was served on affiant on May 25, 1907; that prior to May 18, 1907, affiant was secretary of said company, but resigned as such secretary, and his resignation was accepted on said May 18th, and at no time thereafter was he such secretary or in possession of or had control of said books. It next appears that on the —— day of June, 1907, said Shanahan made and filed in said court an affidavit setting forth in substance the foregoing facts; that he had made demand for the production and inspection of said books by virtue of said writ after service thereof on petitioner herein, but was not furnished access to or allowed to inspect said books, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.