McCabe

McCabe v. Willard

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 122·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 107·6 P.2d 258
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1931Docket No. 6865.California1,229 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Defendants executed to plaintiff’s assignor their note for money loaned and secured the same by a deed of trust of real property in the city of Los Angeles. Following default in payment of the note, the property was sold at trustee’s sale for a sum less than the balance due on the note. This action was brought to recover that balance. From a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

In effect the defense to the action presented was that the sale by the trustee was void, and that, consequently, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover judgment as for a balance due after trustee’s sale. The grounds upon which appellants contend that the sale was void relate to alleged defects in the publication of the notice of sale and in the posting of copies of the notice of sale.

Concerning the publication, the points are that the notice was not published for the period required by law, and that the publication was not shown to have been in a newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Los Angeles or county of Los Angeles. At the trial no point seems to have been made with respect to the qualification of the newspaper for the purposes of such notices.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.