Sinsabaugh

Sinsabaugh v. Clark

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 340·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 65·294 P. 462
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1930Docket No. 197.California1,534 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Marks, J.

This action grew out of a motor vehicle accident which happened about 4 o’clock in the afternoon of December 18, 1928, in the intersection of Colton Avenue and Anderson Street in San Bernardino County. Colton Avenue runs east and west and Anderson Street intersects it at right angles. Appellant was riding south on Anderson Street in an automobile driven by Miss Y. M. Riddle. It came into collision with another automobile being driven east on Colton Avenue by respondent. Appellant and Miss Riddle were thrown to the pavement by the impact and seriously injured. They brought separate actions for damages, which were consolidated and tried together before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of respondent. This appeal is taken by appellant from the judgment entered following the verdict.

Appellant maintains that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict and judgment and that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence; that errors of law prejudicial to appellant occurred during the trial, and that the court erred in giving instructions proposed by respondent. The only error of law occurring during the trial specified in her brief is the refusal of the trial court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.