Rinkenberger

Rinkenberger v. Rinkenberger

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 384·99 Cal. App. 45·277 P. 1096
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 1929Docket No. 3778.California2,795 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Los Angeles finding that there is due the plaintiff the sum of $7,277, based upon a judgment of divorce entered in the Superior Court of King County, in the State of Washington, adjudging the plaintiff in this action entitled to a divorce from the defendant herein, and awarding the plaintiff alimony, payable in monthly ■ installments, the overdue monthly installments amounting to the sum just herein stated. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

Upon this appeal the defendant sets forth two grounds alleged as sufficient cause for reversal. First: That the trial court failed to find upon certain affirmative defenses set up as counterclaims or offsets by the defendant, and second: That the judgment of the Superior Court of King County, of the State of Washington, is not a final judgment to which full faith and credit can or should be given in pursuance of the Constitution of the United States.

The counterclaims set up by the defendant are respectively in amounts of $500, $600 and $1,200, alleged as the value of certain personal property awarded to the defendant by the- superior court of King County, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.