Bruntsch

Bruntsch v. Sales

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 178·74 Cal. App. 310·240 P. 43
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 1925Docket No. 5139.California2,006 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The appellant, Dudley D. Sales, a practicing attorney at law in the city and county of San Francisco, was sued by the respondents Herbert D. and Ernest A. Bruntseh, brothers-in-law of the appellant, for profits alleged to have been secretly made by the appellant in a real estate transaction in which it is claimed that appellant acted as agent and attorney for the respondents. Separate suits were filed by respondents, later they were consolidated and a trial was had by the court sitting without a jury, judgment was rendered against appellant in each action and appeals were taken from those judgments.

In the gore block in San Francisco located between Market Street and Eddy Street is a piece of property extending from Market Street to Eddy Street, rectangular in form, which may be said to be owned as follows: The' lot fronting on Market Street is owned one-half by the Cooks and the other half by the Bruntsches, and the lot fronting on Eddy Street is owned by the Luchsingers. The findings are as follows:

The appellant contends that the defendant’s client was his wife, Mrs. Sales, and his obligation as an attorney was to discuss the questions of duty and responsibility with Mrs.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.