Brumhall

Brumhall v. Sutherland

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 10·293 P. 672
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 1930Docket No. 4214.California1,073 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for damages in favor of the plaintiff for personal injuries sustained by him in the fall of a hoist or elevator which was being used in the construction of a building.

At the time of the accident the plaintiff was engaged in unloading from the hoist platform, which was then stationary at the ninth floor of the building, steel pans, or forms, into which to pour concrete. While the plaintiff was so engaged the elevator platform fell with him to the ground, thereby causing the injuries in question. The defendant J. V. McNeil Company was the general contractor for the construction of the building. The defendant Sutherland was employed by the general contractor as hoisting engineer. The plaintiff was an employee of a subcontractor and, at the time of the accident, was working as such. The subcontractor had entered into a contract with the general contractor to install and remove the steel forms, of pans. The general contractor had constructed and was using four hoists. At the time of the accident the defendant Sutherland was the only hoistman, and he was alternately operating all four hoists, including the one which fell with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.