Peschong

Peschong v. Madden

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 632·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 988·281 P. 1068
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1929Docket No. 5569.California1,783 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hahn, J.

The action which gives rise to this appeal is one wherein plaintiffs, as huyera of certain real property, sought to recover from the defendants, one of whom was the owner of the property and the other the agent of the owner, a judgment for the sum of $300 paid on account of the purchase price. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $300, as prayed for, the defendants appeal.

On the lot in question, at the time the negotiations for its sale and purchase were consummated, a house was in the course of construction under the direction of defendant Gordon W. Madden, who was the agent and son of defendant Alice M. Madden, owner of the property. The negotiations for the purchase were concluded ón or about March 27, 1924, and escrow instructions were signed and filed with the escrow agent, the Venice City Bank, on or about March 31st. These escrow instructions, among other things, provided that the purchase price of the property was to be $7,250, which sum was to be paid as follows: The sellers were to place a first mortgage lien on the property for the sum of $3,400, which the buyers were to assume and pay. In addition, the buyers were to execute their promissory note for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.