Umstead

Umstead v. Automobile Funding Co. of America

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 493·44 Cal. App. 16·185 P. 1011
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 1919Civ. No. 3009.California2,371 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to rescind a lease and conditional sale of an automobile, and to recover payments made, on the ground that the automobile was not new, as represented prior to the making of the contract. The real parties plaintiff are Kate A. Umstead and Edith G. Lawrence, sisters, their husbands also being made parties. Cousins and Lawrence (the latter not related to plaintiffs), partners, operating under the name of Chevrolet Motor Car Company of Los Angeles, were dealers in automobiles. Defendant is a corporation engaged in the purchasing of cars and trucks from dealers who have already found a buyer, and in turn leasing them to the purchasers on terms; in other words,' as we view it, reselling them on credit. The lower court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiffs Kate A. Umstead and Edith G. Lawrence were desirous of purchasing a new automobile, and made several trips to the place of business of Cousins and Lawrence to inspect automobiles and have the same demonstrated. They finally decided to buy, and claim that they selected one of two cars on the floor of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.