Rothschild

Rothschild v. Superior Court

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 345·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 452·293 P. 106
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 1930Docket No. 7644.California909 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Petitioner seeks an original writ of mandamus to compel Naomi Roloff to be sworn and to testify as a witness upon the taking of her deposition in an action pending in said court.

Arnold R. Roloff sued petitioner for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall from a ladder on premises leased from petitioner. Pending the trial of the action peti tioner sought to take the deposition of plaintiff’s wife, Naomi Roloff. She refused to testify on the ground that she was excused under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 1881 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The material provisions of this section read: “A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife without her consent; nor a wife for or against her husband, without his consent; nor can either, during the marriage or afterward, be, without the consent of the other, examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage. ...”

Under the plain wording of the section it is manifest that if the husband is the sole party in interest in an action his wife may not be called to testify for or against him without his consent. Petitioner seeks to avoid this exemption on the ground.that in the action here…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.