Snodgrass

Snodgrass v. Snodgrass

Caution
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 750·81 Cal. App. 360·253 P. 755
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1927Docket No. 5433.California1,001 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cashin, J.

Appeals from the judgments entered for defendant in two actions brought by appellant to recover for services alleged to have been rendered to defendant at his request.

The cause of action in each complaint was stated in the form of two common counts, one for the value of services rendered and the other upon an account stated, it being alleged in each count that the claim was unpaid.

The actions, numbered 150686 and 150687 respectively, as shown by the register of actions in the trial court, were by stipulation of the parties tried together, and the appeals are presented on the same transcript.

The allegations of the complaint, which were denied, were found to be untrue, and appellant contends that the findings on the issues in the first case are not sustained by the evidence.

While the testimony in that ease was conflicting on the questions whether services were rendered and an account stated as alleged, the record discloses sufficient evidence to support the findings of the court on these decisive issues, and its conclusions cannot be disturbed (Del Monte Ranch Dairy Co. v. Bernardo, 174 Cal. 757 [ 164 Pac. 628 ]; City of San Diego v. Hall, 180 Cal. 165 [ 179 Pac. 889…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.