Bowen

Hylton Flour Mills, Inc. v. Bowen

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 711·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1209·18 P.2d 689
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 1933Docket No. 632.California919 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover from defendant damages for the alleged breach of a written contract. Defendant interposed a demurrer, both general and special, to plaintiff's complaint. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and judgment was rendered in defendant’s favor. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. It is conceded that the single question presented for consideration upon this appeal is the sufficiency of the complaint to withstand the attack presented by defendant’s general demurrer.

Two grounds were urged before the trial court in support of the demurrer to the complaint and are here urged by defendant in support of the judgment. These grounds are, first, that the contract for whose breach the action was brought is void for uncertainty and, second, that the complaint shows on its face that it seeks to recover liquidated damages expressly prohibited by section 1670 of the Civil Code.

The contract is pleaded in haec verba in the complaint. Omitting that portion of the instrument entitled “Conditions”, it is in the following language:

It is alleged in the complaint that by this contract defendant agreed to purchase from plaintiff 630 barrels of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.