Sumner

Sumner v. Nevin

Good Law
1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 25·4 Cal. App. 347·87 P. 1105
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1906Civ. No. 258.California1,306 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Judgment for defendant entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer, without leave to amend, from which plaintiff appeals.

It appears from the amended complaint that plaintiff, in November, 1901, held an exclusive agency for the sale of certain real property in the city of Los Angeles; that while such agency was in force plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, by the terms of which plaintiff employed defendant in sajd business of real estate and in such other capacity as he might elect, and the second party agreed to devote his entire time and attention to the interests and business of said first party upon such business as said first party may direct, receiving as compensation therefor ten per cent commission on all policies of insurance placed by him with said first party, and one-half of the net commissions received on all loans, rentals, real estate deals and other transactions brought to plaintiff by defendant. It was agreed that such contract of employment might be terminated by either party upon fifteen days’ notice in writing, and that all deals pending at the time of the termination of said contract were to be closed and the proceeds divided under the contract.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.