Majors

Majors v. Girdner

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 345·31 Cal. App. 47·159 P. 826
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 6, 1916Civ. No. 1492.California3,697 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The action is on a promissory note for the sum of $350, which, it is alleged, was made and delivered by the defendant to the Pacific Coast Securities Company, a corporation (for brevity to be hereinafter referred to as “the corporation”), and after such execution and delivery, assigned by the original payee to the plaintiff, “who is now the lawful owner and holder thereof.”

The answer admits the execution and delivery of the note as alleged in the complaint, but asserts that the instrument was procured from the defendant by the corporation above named through misrepresentation and fraud.

The gist of the charges of fraud set out in the answer may thus summarily be stated: That the corporation, through its duly accredited agents, called upon the defendant and offered him the stock of the corporation at the price of $15 per share, the par value of which was $10 per share; that said agents guaranteed and warranted said stock to be of the value at least of $15 per share; that at said time, as an inducement to the defendant to buy said stock, said agents entered into an agreement in writing, whereby they bound the corporation “to extend the time of payment of note to suit applicant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.