Glenn

Glenn v. Inouye

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 471·62 Cal. App. 259·216 P. 418
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1923Civ. No. 4132.California1,994 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

This action was brought by H. R. Glenn, respondent, against Takara Inouye, appellant, to recover the possession of certain premises situated in Los Angeles, California, and held by appellant under a certain lease from the Aleo Realty Company, a corporation, to appellant.

The Aleo Realty Company, a corporation, on or about March 21, 1921, leased to Takara Inouye, the appellant herein, by a certain lease in writing, the premises described as “The two upper floors at No. 128 E. First street, Los Angeles, California,” for the period of two years and six months from April 1, 1921, at a monthly rental of $250, payable in advance on the first day of each month of said term.

The said lease was accepted by the appellant, who thereupon went into possession of the leased premises under and by virtue of said lease, and still continues to hold and occupy the same. Appellant has paid the rental provided for in the lease and is not in default in the payment of rental. The said lease contains the following clause:

The Aleo Realty Company, on or about February 25, 1922, entered into a contract in writing with H. R. Glenn, the respondent herein, whereby the Aleo Realty Company, as seller, agreed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.