Newcomb

Newcomb v. Title Guarante & Trust Company

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 329·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 747·21 P.2d 456
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 1933Docket No. 8750.California1,196 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Geary, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rescinding an • installment agreement for the purchase and sale of a lot in Burbank, California, and for the recovery of the money theretofore paid on the purchase price, based upon the ground that the sale was brought about by means of false and fraudulent representations.

The record title to the lot stood in the name of the Title Guarantee and Trust Company; and as owner it executed said agreement and accepted all payments made thereunder by respondent, as purchaser. The sale was negotiated and the alleged fraudulent representations were made by Ninon Hudson, a real estate broker operating under the fictitious name of Ninon Hudson Organization, and two salesmen in her employ named Moore and Moss. Both salesmen were made parties defendant, but they are not affected by the judgment, the appeal having been taken by the remaining defendants. The trial court found that the charges of fraud were proved; and the evidence is legally sufficient to support such findings. It further found upon sufficient legal evidence that said trust company was acting in the transaction merely as trustee for certain undisclosed principals and “had no knowledge or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.