People v. Poo On

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 115·49 Cal. App. 219·192 P. 1090
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 1920Crim. No. 523.California1,747 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nicol, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the superior court of Stanislaus County of the crime of practicing medicine without a license, and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. The information charged the defendant with a violation of section 17 of the State Medical Practice Act (Stats. 1913, p. 734), the said information alléging that: “The said Poo On on or about the nineteenth day of September A. D. 1919, at and in the said county of Stanislaus, state of California, and prior to the filing of this information, did then and there willfully and unlawfully practice, attempt to practice and advertise and hold himself out as practicing a system or mode of treating the sick and afflicted in this state without having at the time of so doing a valid unrevoked certificate from the state board of medical examiners of the state of California.”

The appellant attacks the information on the ground that it sets forth many different offenses which have not been separately stated, and also on the ground that the said information does not substantially conform to the requirements of section 951 of the Penal Code, “in this, that it does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.