Summerbell

Summerbell v. Weller

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 406·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 52·294 P. 414
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1930Docket No. 5759.California474 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, pursuant to an order sustaining demurrers to second amended complaint without leave to amend complaint.

The undertaking (exhibit “A” of the second amended complaint) is the statutory bond required by section 1 of the Public Works Act (Stats. 1919, p. 487), enacted to secure the payment of claims of persons employed by contractors upon public works, etc. (Continental Nat. Bank v. Republic Casualty Co., 202 Cal. 586 [ 262 Pac. 300 ]; Stone v. Shackelford, 64 Cal. App. 750 [ 222 Pac. 846 ].)

It is contended by respondent United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company that the record shows that the action was commenced after expiration of the ninety-day period in which such action may be filed as provided and limited by section 2 of said Public Works Act of 1919, and that for this reason there was no cause of action on the bond. On the other hand, appellant contends that, since he filed his verified statement of claim within the time and within the manner provided by the statute, he was not limited to ninety days after the expiration of the period allowed for filing statement of claim, but might bring his action on the undertaking within a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.