Drown

Drown v. Haddock

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 615·61 Cal. App. 654·215 P. 689
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1923Civ. No. 3791.California501 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

Defendant purchased from plaintiff, under a written conditional sale contract, “1 Admiral Play Press with 8 H. P. International Harvester Engine attached, and one pair of small platform scales.” These articles were to have been paid for, at a date fixed in the contract, by a certain lump sum, with interest and attorney's fees. Payment not having been made upon the day designated, plaintiff commenced this action to recover the amount due. He had judgment and defendant appeals.

The sole point argued by appellant is that there was a “lack or failure of consideration” for the contract between the parties. Although the agreement listed the articles described in it as we have listed them above, appellant refers to them in his brief, collectively, as a “hay-baling outfit.” Treating the subject of the sale as a single thing, that is, as a hay-baling outfit, appellant contends that the transfer was without consideration for the reason that several witnesses testified that the three articles actually listed in the contract of sale would not work as a hay-baler and that parts of the machinery broke down when the attempt was made to use them for that purpose. Appellant’s view is that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.