Dye

Potomac Oil Co. v. Dye

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 534·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 198·102 P. 677
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 1909Civ. No. 661.California1,854 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Taggart, J.

Application for writ of mandamus. Mandamus. Petition shows the corporation petitioner was incorporated under the laws of the territory of Arizona, with its principal place of business at Phoenix, Arizona, and a provision in its articles of incorporation that it should have a branch office in the city of Los Angeles, California; and that the purpose of its incorporation was to buy, lease, hold and operate oil lands and oil wells and deal in the products thereof throughout the United States. That all its property is situated in the state of California, and it is, and has been for several years, engaged in operating its said property in that state, and during all this time all its business transactions and operations have been, and now are, carried on through its office established at Los Angeles in the state of California, in accordance with the provisions therefor in its articles of incorporation. That all of its directors’ meetings except two or three have, since December 29, 1908, been held in California, and that its fixed purpose and intent is to continue to so carry on its business and operations in said state.

That the officers of said corporation, according to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.