Lindow

Lindow v. Cohn

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 311·5 Cal. App. 388·90 P. 485
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 15, 1907Civ. No. 292.California1,160 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

The facts as they appear from the record are: That one Peiser, as traveling salesman and soliciting agent of Meyerstein Company, plaintiff’s assignor, sold to defendant a lot of merchandise, consisting of corduroy trousers, and on behalf of his principal made covenants of warranty as to the quality of the goods. Some six weeks after the goods had been received and paid for by defendant, Peiser again called upon defendant, soliciting further orders for his house, when defendant for the first time made complaint, stating that the corduroy trousers were not as he had represented them; that every pair thereof which defendant had sold had been brought back to him, and that he, defendant, had been compelled to reimburse the purchasers thereof. Whereupon Peiser admitted that the goods were not as warranted, and said to defendant that he wanted his trade, that he would do all that he could to make it right and told defendant to return the goods and charge his principal, the Meyerstein Company, with the goods shipped back, plus freight charges and the amount of defendant’s loss in making adjustments with his customers. Defendant then gave Peiser an order on Meyerstein Company for the bill…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.