Nuisance—Operation op Gasworks—Similar Sources op Discomfort Not a Defense.—In an action to abate a nuisance caused by the method of operating certain gasworks, the fact that other sources of possible discomfort to the plaintiff existed in the neighborhood of his property is no defense.

Id.—Abatement—Impairment of Health Not Bssential.^-Id order to justify the abatement of such a nuisance, it is not necessary that the health of the plaintiff or of members of his family should have been impaired. It'is sufficient if the odors, sounds, and smoke were offensive to the senses.

Id.—Intermittent Nuisance May Be Enjoined.—The fact that, owing to periodical cessation of work, variation in the direction of the wind, and the like, a nuisance is intermittent is not a reason for denying its abatement.

Id.—Damages for Personal Discomfort—Want of Damage to Property.—In an action to recover damages caused by a nuisance, the plaintiff is entitled to recover for the personal discomfort or annoyance to which he has been subjected, without proving any damage to his property. It is for the trial court to determine the amount of the compensation he should receive for such damage.

Id.—Gasworks Not Nuisance Per Se—Unlawful Method op Operation.—A gas factory does not constitute a nuisance per se, but, like any other sort of lawful business, the person conducting it is subject to the rule sie utere tuo wt dliermm non laedas, even when operating under municipal permission or under public obligation to furnish a commodity. Nor will the adoption of the most approved appliances and methods of production justify the continuance of that which, in spite of them, remains a nuisance.

Id.—Construction or Judgment.—In such an action a judgment enjoining the defendant “from conducting and operating the gasworks and manufactory ... in such a manner as to cause or permit smoke, gases or offensive smells or fumes to be emitted therefrom or to be precipitated therefrom upon the property of the plaintiff,” properly interpreted, is not too broad, when it is conceded by the defendant that the works cannot be operated at all without producing the conditions complained of.